How does this relate to the existing lockings.co.uk WordPress site?
It is a single-page rebuild of the /beverley route only, designed to be lifted into the existing firm-wide WordPress site as a standalone Beverley office page (Hull and York keep their current pages). Two options on hand-over: (a) port the rebuild back into a WordPress template that matches, so the firm-wide CMS keeps editing rights, or (b) host the Beverley page on the Astro and Vercel build and 301 the old URL to it. Either way the rest of the firm-wide lockings.co.uk site is left alone. The Beverley page is the unit of work, not the whole firm.
Why a Beverley-only rebuild rather than a firm-wide one?
Because the Beverley office has the most to gain from being treated as its own page. Multi-office solicitors are bought one office at a time: a Beverley homeowner instructing a residential conveyancing matter is not comparing Lockings Beverley to Lockings Hull, she is comparing it to the independent solicitor on North Bar Within. The firm-wide template flattens that office-by-office competition, and on the Beverley page it actively backfires (the JSON-LD says Hull). Fixing Beverley first costs a fraction of a firm-wide rebuild and shows whether the structure (named branch manager above the fold, schema on the office page that names the office, the building in the hero) lifts the Beverley office's share of "solicitors Beverley", "conveyancing solicitor HU17", "wills solicitor Beverley" search results. If it does, the same structure ports to Hull and York at the same fixed-fee rate.
What schema, exactly, gets added?
A single LegalService + LocalBusiness JSON-LD block on the Beverley office page with full PostalAddress (Highgate House, 19 Wednesday Market, Beverley HU17 0DJ), telephone in E.164 (+441482300500), email (welcome@lockings.co.uk), opening hours, areaServed of Beverley and the surrounding villages, and SRA Organisation 626081 plus Companies House 09244568 as credentialed identifiers. A Person entry for Craig Schofield with his Beverley Branch Manager role. Five Service entries (Residential Conveyancing, Wills and Probate, Lasting Powers of Attorney, Settlement Agreements, Family). A FAQPage entry for the five questions on the page itself. The firm-wide Organization stays where it is; this is additive, not replacing.
You only have one design pass before you commit, and the firm does not have refreshed brand assets yet. Is that a problem?
No. The proposal site you are reading is the design pass. The /preview page is the rebuild, in full, on real fonts and a Beverley-derived palette, with the real photographs of Wednesday Market and the real Lockings copy. What you are signing off on is what you see. There is no second concept round, no mood-board phase, no waiting for a designer to interpret a brief. If the firm later wants to refresh the brand mark or commission a proper photographer for the Highgate House frontage, the rebuild swaps those assets in cleanly on launch day. The structure stays.
What does "fixed fee" cover and what is excluded?
Two thousand pounds covers the full Beverley-office-page rebuild as described above: hero with the Wednesday Market photograph, Craig's director card, five-line service grid, 77-year heritage band, FAQ, visit block with embedded map, full JSON-LD, meta and og tags, one round of revisions before publish, DNS or route handover. One hundred and fifty pounds per month covers ongoing hosting on Vercel (or the WordPress-port equivalent), monthly schema review as the team changes, security updates, monthly analytics email and one editorial change per month. Fifty pounds per month is the optional embedded chatbot trained on the five front-door FAQs. Excluded: firm-wide rebrand work, the Hull and York office pages, the firm-wide navigation, and any content the SRA wants restructured. If the rebuild lands and the firm wants the same treatment for Hull or York, that is a separate scope at the same fixed-fee rate per page.